If I do take a guess, it will probably be wrong. We have a lot of streamlining to do with the XR9-S process before we clone it into another product, including supply chain issues we are having right now.
If I do take a guess, it will probably be wrong. We have a lot of streamlining to do with the XR9-S process before we clone it into another product, including supply chain issues we are having right now.
.40 S&W would lose one round. A .45 caliber would lose one more round (5+1).
Barrels longer that 4.2" may be offered, but in 9mm, you don't gain as much as you would in a .40 or .357 Sig.
Wasn't there a discussion about offering XR9S' with extended barrels for the Canadian market to meet their legal requirements?
Arne Boberg said:
Barrels longer that 4.2" may be offered...
In our next batch of barrels we are going to make some in 4.2". However, it is a very time-consuming and expensive undertaking to get registered and certified with the US State Department - we presently don't have the resources for that just yet.
In our next batch of barrels we are going to make some in 4.2". However, it is a very time-consuming and expensive undertaking to get registered and certified with the US State Department - we presently don't have the resources for that just yet.
Arne put me on the order for a 4.2" barrel. Thanks
Arne Boberg said:
In our next batch of barrels we are going to make some in 4.2". However, it is a very time-consuming and expensive undertaking to get registered and certified with the US State Department - we presently don't have the resources for that just yet.
In our next batch of barrels we are going to make some in 4.2". However, it is a very time-consuming and expensive undertaking to get registered and certified with the US State Department - we presently don't have the resources for that just yet.
© 2012 Created by Arne Boberg.