Boberg Arms

Will you be offering an accessory threaded barrel? 

Would this pistol work well with a can?

Views: 841

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What would work on the current XR9-S, with extended barrel, would be suppressor that would spin freely on the barrel.

They're apparently called a "Nielsen device". AAC calls theirs an A.S.A.P, everyone has a different one. They talk about them on their websites and in their catalogs.

I  wrote out a long reply then lost it.  Anyway, a fully rotating mount would change the point of impact (POI) as the suppressor spins but is probably the only universal solution.  Is there any way to prevent over tightening is using  left-hand threads?  I've got cans and a XR9-s but no way to attach the two.

Why would allowing the suppressor to spin alter the point of impact?

I'm not an engineer (or a photographer) but I assume its because the internal baffles arent symmetrical and there is different pressure or turbulence around the bore.  Just my guess as to why.  Not a huge issue at pistol distances but POI shift is real and needs to be considered.

If that turns out to be an issue, you can allow the suppressor to spin freely relative to the barrel, but add a guide rail to the slide (front sight attachment?) which will key it to the same location every time.

A Nielsen device will NOT help the Boberg cycle as it decouples the axial inertia and imparts rearward force. They do not decouple rotationally as the Boberg would require.

Having a can which spins freely around the barrel is very easy to make, but does not currently exist. A light can of small diameter might work (AWC Abraxas, 3.3 oz, 1in diameter), but I don't know the properties of the locking collar that Mr. Boberg tried. Most German muzzle threads are left handed and the standard 9mm thread on modern HKs and Sigs is left hand, so that isn't a problem. 

A freely rotating suppressor would affect point of impact, but with a pistol round, at pistol ranges and pistol accuracies, it might not even be noticeable (assuming it is very precisely made). Furthermore it could only decouple for the cycling and lock-up again at the same location when cycling is complete. My main concern would be the weight of the can putting extra stress on the barrel locking points and causing accelerated wear. Another option is for the can to be of fixed design, but to have a type of muzzle brake (gas deflector) at the end that imparts a spinning motion (similar to russian gas powered gatlings).

I would be interested in suppressing the XR9-S as it seems ideal, being short and having a longer than normal time for the breech to open. I would definitely get a threaded barrel for mine if I could when I come up on the wait list.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

© 2012   Created by Arne Boberg.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service