Tags:
What would work on the current XR9-S, with extended barrel, would be suppressor that would spin freely on the barrel.
Permalink Reply by jradz on March 1, 2012 at 9:58pm They're apparently called a "Nielsen device". AAC calls theirs an A.S.A.P, everyone has a different one. They talk about them on their websites and in their catalogs.
Permalink Reply by Rveach on March 27, 2012 at 8:51pm I wrote out a long reply then lost it. Anyway, a fully rotating mount would change the point of impact (POI) as the suppressor spins but is probably the only universal solution. Is there any way to prevent over tightening is using left-hand threads? I've got cans and a XR9-s but no way to attach the two.
Permalink Reply by Paul Koning on March 28, 2012 at 8:13pm Why would allowing the suppressor to spin alter the point of impact?
Permalink Reply by PATRAT on March 29, 2012 at 12:10am If that turns out to be an issue, you can allow the suppressor to spin freely relative to the barrel, but add a guide rail to the slide (front sight attachment?) which will key it to the same location every time.
Permalink Reply by Martin W. on March 29, 2012 at 1:40am A Nielsen device will NOT help the Boberg cycle as it decouples the axial inertia and imparts rearward force. They do not decouple rotationally as the Boberg would require.
Having a can which spins freely around the barrel is very easy to make, but does not currently exist. A light can of small diameter might work (AWC Abraxas, 3.3 oz, 1in diameter), but I don't know the properties of the locking collar that Mr. Boberg tried. Most German muzzle threads are left handed and the standard 9mm thread on modern HKs and Sigs is left hand, so that isn't a problem.
A freely rotating suppressor would affect point of impact, but with a pistol round, at pistol ranges and pistol accuracies, it might not even be noticeable (assuming it is very precisely made). Furthermore it could only decouple for the cycling and lock-up again at the same location when cycling is complete. My main concern would be the weight of the can putting extra stress on the barrel locking points and causing accelerated wear. Another option is for the can to be of fixed design, but to have a type of muzzle brake (gas deflector) at the end that imparts a spinning motion (similar to russian gas powered gatlings).
I would be interested in suppressing the XR9-S as it seems ideal, being short and having a longer than normal time for the breech to open. I would definitely get a threaded barrel for mine if I could when I come up on the wait list.
BretShooter replied to Arne Boberg's discussion The Latest TheTruthAboutGuns.com Boberg XR9-S Review
Tauno metsisto replied to Arne Boberg's discussion The Latest TheTruthAboutGuns.com Boberg XR9-S Review
BretShooter replied to Forum Admin's discussion Preventing Slide Lockup & Ammo Jams: Owner's Manual Cleaning & Lube Instructions
mike Lecka replied to Forum Admin's discussion Preventing Slide Lockup & Ammo Jams: Owner's Manual Cleaning & Lube Instructions
mike Lecka replied to Arne Boberg's discussion The Latest TheTruthAboutGuns.com Boberg XR9-S Review
BretShooter replied to Arne Boberg's discussion The Latest TheTruthAboutGuns.com Boberg XR9-S Review
Thomas replied to Arne Boberg's discussion The Latest TheTruthAboutGuns.com Boberg XR9-S Review© 2012 Created by Arne Boberg.