I've been following the development of the "Shorty" for a while now.
Curious if any discussions have been had with Crimson Trace about offering a laser for this pistol? There does not seem to be much space available under the dust cover for their Laserguard model, and I'm not sure if the grip panels are replaceable for a more traditional Laser grip model?
I'm a believer in lasers, and have them on all my defensive handguns (currently a Glock 19, 26, and a Ruger LCP). I've used ArmaLaser, Lasermax (the internal guide rod lasers) and Crimson Trace, and like the CT units the best, since they turn on by simply gripping the pistol.
I've been looking for a RELIABLE pocket 9mm pistol - I had two PM9's with numerous issues. The R9 is too expensive, and won't fire +P ammo. The rest are really too large for pocket carry.
I wish you best of luck bringing this to market!
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Flavio Bastiani on March 15, 2010 at 6:45pm
Permalink Reply by Robert Hylton on May 22, 2011 at 7:03pm I submitted a recommendation on their website, but instead of them contacting us, they started spamming us, so I had to block CT. We have something else cooking...
Robert Hylton said:
Been over a year since this thread has been commented on, so, any progress with CT on grips?
Permalink Reply by PATRAT on July 27, 2011 at 10:56am Perhaps the line to take would be for CT to sell a component kit. From what I understand, when you buy components from a patent holder, you get a single use license for their patent to use that physical component set however you wish. Making it possible to use their working parts to make your own grip?
Permalink Reply by PATRAT on July 28, 2011 at 9:43am
Permalink Reply by Jethro on September 15, 2011 at 2:13pm Maybe Laserlyte would make one similar to their product for the Ruger LCP. As a smaller company than Crimson Trace, maybe they'll "try harder." I too prefer my carry to have a laser.
http://laserlyte.com/New_Products/index.html?gclid=CMrc3rn6n6sCFYlM...
I plan on giving those guys a call.
Permalink Reply by alternety on September 16, 2011 at 12:29pm
Permalink Reply by Jeff Mossington on September 30, 2011 at 7:52pm Never is a strong word. Think of all the years Kahr went without having a laser. That was then and this is now. My original goal was to have a laser under the barrel of the XR9-L, but instead went forward with the Shorty, which has very little space in that area. That leaves a few other options: a laser in the rear sight, laser on the side, or laser on the grips (unless someone can come up with another one). To have a laser option that would fit all of our XR9-series pistols, these are the three options. Under the barrel would only work for the longer pistols. I am currently in discussion with a laser manufacturer as to which option to pursue. If none of the options are practical, then we still have Y2015 when the CTC patent expires. Expect a lot of competition to come out then. Their subsequent patents are cool, but not as exclusive as their first.
In the meanwhile, the "large stone gate" of CTC may open up if they think they can sell a lot of lasers for XR9 pistols.
BretShooter replied to Arne Boberg's discussion The Latest TheTruthAboutGuns.com Boberg XR9-S Review© 2012 Created by Arne Boberg.