differences between xr9-m and xr9-l

i see the overall lengths are .450" apart, but the barrell lengths are the same (both 4.2") why is this? what is different about the two pistols to keep the barrell length the same but overall length is affected?

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Arne Boberg on January 17, 2010 at 3:22pm

A typo - barrel length follows overall length (or vice-versa). While we haven't finalized it yet, a proposed XR9-M would have a 3.75" barrel.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by broncoo on January 17, 2010 at 5:37pm

ahh okay thanks for the reply

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by fir on March 1, 2011 at 11:01am

the dimensions of the proposed XR9-M with a 3.75" barrel sound just perfect to me. give it a nice grip extension/ more firepower and you would make at least one customer more than happy with this product (-;

Arne Boberg said:

A typo - barrel length follows overall length (or vice-versa). While we haven't finalized it yet, a proposed XR9-M would have a 3.75" barrel.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Arne Boberg on March 2, 2011 at 4:55pm

Plus, the overall length of a future XR9-M would be the about the same as a Kimber Solo, a Kahr PM9 and a Sig P290, but with a barrel the same length as a Beretta Cougar!